#Cubase vs pro tools vs logic pro how to#
#Cubase vs pro tools vs logic pro skin#
#Cubase vs pro tools vs logic pro software#

Some potential cellists will spent a lot of money just because Tina Guo plays that one. It's the same thing with real instruments, put Tina Guo behind any cello (even school one) it will sound great. Why I said fashion question? Simply because, some guy see HZ uses Cubase and then say: 'wow I will buy Cubase to do the same!'. If that time FL was reasonable choice, we would discuss now why most composers uses FL Studio or similar He uses Cubase for years and he know Cubase well for his needs. We will probably never heard Gladiator or Interstellar or Man of steel soundtracks. Imagine what will happen if HZ every little do sequencer switching (new Bitwig is released) and analyses is this vst good or not. You don't have time to explore sequencers and other stuff, and that's why you will mostly find answers like: 'I'm using only Zebra, I don't have time to explore any vst today, I can do everything with Zebra'. Now, imagine you are well known famous composer who is focused on own work and upcoming projects.

Cubase is 'old' software, almost most older then others, and many composers worked with Cubase since first version because that time it was not many choices.

Just records into Digital Performer and exports his stems.Īhh, it's higher logic behind that and fashion question. One of my friends has made millions as a composer - many millions - and does not own ProTools. However, a good bit of the time you will just export your stems to the engineer and he or she will work on it at the engineer's studio, using the plugins and all the gear the engineer already owns and with which the engineer is familiar.

#Cubase vs pro tools vs logic pro how to#

Ubiquity - if you hire any engineer to work on your material at your place, he or she will know how to work with ProTools and therefore will be much faster at the mixing stage in it. It is possible with some, but not all, DAW software.Ģ. Zero latency live recording - this is extremely valuable if you are recording live players. ProTools is on all of them too, but primarily for audio. Cubase, Logic, Digital Performer - any of these can be found on major motion pictures. I agree with those who suggest avoiding ProTools and focusing (especially at the beginning) on your writing. Imagine how much people uses mixing desks (hardware) and how many just pure workstations. with home studios or small studios, and no one invest in their product. You know why? Because more and more people invest in Cubase, Live, etc. Now, these days, Avid (Digi Design) realized that you can do mastering even in Adobe Audition and they updated version of all-mighty PT to support any sound card.

#Cubase vs pro tools vs logic pro software#

It was software specialized for studios etc. That time you have to buy dedicated sound-cards just for PT, because PT was unable to work without M-Audio, Digi Design, etc.

#Cubase vs pro tools vs logic pro skin#

It's just a same tool as any other but with different skin and different learning curve.Īnd who said that PT is best tool for mastering and mixing? This idea is from era of mixing desks provided by Digi Design. With Cubase you will not become better producer, neither PT. I would suggest to you this, learn and master your (one) tool and spread your ideas over orchestrating instead of floating over sequencer wars. It's just a little difference in some aspects, for example Cubase has articulation manager, other software not, but what if you like separate articulations on separate channels then you can garbage articulation manager functionality. You cannot do something more in Cubase then you can do with PT or FL Studio in overall. it's just a personal taste and deepth of wallet. Many serious composers uses PT, many Cubase, many Logic, many Reaper. Actually you can score in FL studio as well At the end it's just a tool, and if you are Ninja in FL Studio then why not stay with FL Studio.